I'm actively participating in the OpenStreetMap project since about a week. Today I tagged two roads google maps doesn't know about (so at least in one very small part of the world osm is more accurate than google).
They're the Euro- and D-Mark street in Murrhardt. And yes, they invent stupid street names here.

Ich würde ja nie behaupten, mich in Geographie sonderlich gut auszukennen, aber ich war mir doch relativ sicher, dass die Pfalz nicht im Allgäu liegt.

Google Maps sieht das aber anders.

Google has the reputation to be free software-friendly. Without doubt they did a lot in the past, especially many Summer of Code-Projects, that developed essential features for free software projects.

That google is also willing to put legal threat on free software projects if they compete in their are, they recently showed against the project gaia. It was a project to have a replacement client for google earth (google's own client is proprietary). It was done by pure reverse engineering. The author took the project down after he received a letter from google.

It's quite questionable if gaia is doing anything illegal. They didn't use any data from google, they just provided another client for the service. In my opinion it's very important to fight for the right to reverse engineer. Many essential free software projects wouldn't exist if we couldn't reverse engineer. Just think of many hardware drivers, filesystem support, samba, many multimedia codecs, support for proprietary document formats (e. g. doc in OOo) and lot's more.

By the way, I took the freedom to host a copy of the latest gaia-version (and, as requested by some comments, the win32-patch for gaia). It's GPL, so everyone is free to continue the development.