Thursday, June 12. 2008
0.01 % of Xorg
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
From the article:
"It's also important to note that since the modularization of X.Org, the X server isn't the only key piece of the windowing system. Of critical importance to X.Org is also the input and video drivers, X libraries, utilities, and Mesa. None of the work from any of these developers should be discounted and they all play an important role. For this article though, we only analyzed the server git tree."
Can this explain the low percentage?
"It's also important to note that since the modularization of X.Org, the X server isn't the only key piece of the windowing system. Of critical importance to X.Org is also the input and video drivers, X libraries, utilities, and Mesa. None of the work from any of these developers should be discounted and they all play an important role. For this article though, we only analyzed the server git tree."
Can this explain the low percentage?
No, I think this wouldn't change anything.
I'm not really an xorg contributor and those 0.01 % consist of trivial compile fixes and things like that.
I'm not really an xorg contributor and those 0.01 % consist of trivial compile fixes and things like that.
About me
You can find my web page with links to my work as a journalist at https://hboeck.de/.
You may also find my newsletter about climate change and decarbonization technologies interesting.
Hanno Böck
mail: hanno@hboeck.de
Hanno on Mastodon
Impressum
You may also find my newsletter about climate change and decarbonization technologies interesting.
Hanno Böck
mail: hanno@hboeck.de
Hanno on Mastodon
Impressum
Creative Commons
Unless noted otherwise, all content is CC Zero / public domain
